Skip to main content

Change in Amazon algorithms?

Another Amazon related blog post, this time in the form of a question. Namely, have you noticed anything unusual in the rankings of your books on Amazon? The question is brought up by a post on kboards I read today. Its author states, rather unhappily, that books enrolled in Kindle Unlimited enjoy much higher ranking than those that aren’t in it. That one borrow moves a book up in charts much more than it used to and more than a sale does.

Personally, I haven’t noticed the same. What I have noticed is, however, that both sales and borrows make books jump in charts more than they used to, whether or not they have been enrolled to KU. A particular book of mine, not in KU, hadn’t sold in months, yet one sale made it jump from the uglier side of a million-something rank to a hundred thousand. Unheard of before. The drop was deep too, when there were no more sales.

The author of the post on kboard is convinced that Amazon has changed its algorithms and is favouring books that have been enrolled in Kindle Unlimited. I have a differing view to offer.


The current Amazon algorithm, as far as I understand, takes into account the overall sales of books, and moves the books up and down in the ranking in relation to how many books have been sold in general in a particular time. The ranking of a particular book changes less when many books are being sold, and more when fewer books are sold over all. One sale can make a book jump in ranking when its been a slow day overall, and, respectively, a very good day for a book might barely show in ranking if all books have sold well that day.

So. Could it be that ever since Kindle Unlimited, fewer books have been sold overall? Personally, I can tell that I sell fewer books than before, and although borrowing is up, it hasn’t really reached the numbers of my sales before KU. I have read different stories as well; there are many who haven’t noticed any great changes, and some say so in the comments of the kboard post too.

Nonetheless, my very subjective and limited take prompts me to wonder, if the jumps in the rankings are happening because, overall, the book sales are down. That instead of giving a boost to books in KU, the algorithm is as it has been, and there are simply fewer books moving. That they aren’t being sold as much as before, but they aren’t really being borrowed either.

What are your thoughts or experiences? Do your books move as much as they have before? Do their rankings jump up and down? Please, share in the comments.

Comments

  1. Ever since the roll out of KU, my book sales on Amazon have dropped dramatically. In fact, for the past month and a half, they have essentially dried up and I can't sell a book for the life of me, not even at 99 cents. I don't know if it has anything to do with KU, I just know that before I was selling 5-10 book a day and now I'm lucky if I sell 1 in a week.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My #worldcon75 experience

Here’s the long overdue report from my day at the WorldCon 75, my first ever time attending. The event was held on August 9-13 in my home country, Finland, so it was a once in a life-time chance to experience it with a minimum trouble. I originally thought to attend the entire five days, but life intervened in the form of work, and so I could only attend on Saturday. I tried to make the most of it by planning a full day.

I arrived at the conference centre about fifteen minutes after the doors opened at nine in the morning, and the queue was already at least fifty metres long. It caused me a few palpitations until I figured it was the line for people who hadn’t purchased their day passes in advance. I had, so I just walked past, trying not to look gleeful. Half an hour later I felt bad for all those people when it was announced that the day was sold out, which left most of them outside. The queue for pre-purchased passes was three persons long, the shortest line for me the entire day. I…

Reading recap: August

August was my worst reading month so far and I only managed to finish two books. I have no excuses other than that I was busy working. I did start two more books, but I didn’t manage to finish them in August. And even though I read eight books in July, I’m now two books behind the schedule in my reading challenge of fifty-five books. I’ll have to step up. As has been my habit throughout the year, one book was from my reading list and the other wasn’t.
First book was Ride the Storm by Karen Chance, the long-awaited next chapter in her Cassandra Palmer urban fantasy series of time-travelling Pythia and her entourage of vampires, demons and mages. One vampire and one mage in particular. As always, it was a wild romp through space and time – at times a bit too wild. The first part of the book was constant tumbling from crisis to battle and back with no breathers or plot development in between, as if the author was afraid that the reader will get bored if something earth-shattering isn’t co…

Working with the editor: a case study

Editing has been on my mind lately, as I’ve been preparing Tracy Hayes, P.I. with the Eye for publishing. As a happy coincidence, Delilah S. Dawson had a lengthytweet chain about the topic too, prompted by her annoyance with aspiring authors unwilling to make changes that editors suggest to their books. Her response, in short, was that no author escapes the changes, so you’d better get used to them from the start. Her notes are useful to read in full.

She was speaking from the point of view of a traditionally published author who has more than one set of editors making suggestions and demands, all of which strive to make the book as good as possible. She doesn’t claim it’s easy to let other people to have their say, but that it’s necessary.
Listening to one’s editor is even more crucial for self-publishing authors, as we lack the gatekeepers of traditional publishing. If you’re lucky, you find one who understands your writing, and who isn’t afraid to tell you how you can improve it. If …