Skip to main content

On stereotypes

“Ours is a culture that prefers to make our identities static and confine them to categories, often diametrically opposed to one another” (Maria Popova)
Do you struggle to make your characters believable when they aren’t your own gender, or are otherwise different than you? Many of us do. It’s difficult enough to understand one’s own self well enough, let alone the other, which is why we so often resort to stereotypes. In a couple of characteristics, we can draw characters that are easily recognisable to all.

Not only are stereotypical characters easier to write, they tend to be well received by the readers too. This is especially true with the ‘heroes’ of genre literature. Readers associate themselves with characters that meet their ideals. Most often these include “the values associated with youth and with masculinity … anything else is taken to be at least less worthwhile or inferior,” as Susan Sontag has noted. Heroes, whoever they might be, often fit this ideal.

Last week, in his column for the Guardian, Damien Walter called for less immature fantasy heroes. The comment section shows clearly how well this was received, which is to say, not well at all. For many, the stereotypical superhero is a character to look up to, and they make their point clear. But, as Mr Walter notes, idolising the superheroes has led “to the arrested development of many men today,” which would make stereotypes not only limiting for authors, but harmful for readers too.

According to Mr Walter, “there is a desperate need for stories that tackle the hard truths of (white) male identity,” and he sees this as a way to writing more complex male characters. But human beings are complex in ways beyond their gender or race. We constantly change too. “Identity is something that you are constantly earning. It is a process that you must be active in,” as Josh Whedon points out.

If you set out to create your characters according to some idea of what they should be, a man or a woman, old or young, black or white, you are limiting yourself from the start. From Susan Sontag:
“A lot of our ideas about what we can do at different ages and what age means are so arbitrary — as arbitrary as sexual stereotypes. I think that the young-old polarization and the male-female polarization are perhaps the two leading stereotypes that imprison people.”
And as much as they “imprison us”, they imprison our characters.

Freeing our characters from the stereotypes isn’t easy. As we create them in our minds we picture them as men and women, old or young, and plan their courses accordingly. But it doesn’t have to go like that.

I wrote a short story recently where I deliberately tried not to give a fixed gender or race for my main character. I gave my character a name that could belong to a man or a woman both, and I didn’t describe the character at all. Pretty early on the character turned out to be a woman, though, partly because there isn’t a gender neutral pronoun in English for the first person singular. But for a long time I thought she could be black just as well as white. In the end, I decided that she would be white, mostly because that’s what I’m more familiar with.

I don’t hold my experiment a failure just because I went with the obvious and gave my character a recognisable gender and race. It was interesting to write a character that could have been anything. That she turned out to be a rather stereotypical representative of her gender works within the story too. I guess that is the excuse we all use.

As an exercise, I warmly recommend that you try to write a character that isn’t obviously a man or a woman. You can free your mind to writing a character that doesn’t follow any predestined behavioural paths, as you have to constantly think whether you’re giving the gender of the character away. Even if you eventually settle for a gender, you will have created a more complex person, not merely a character. And that can lead to anything.


Popular posts from this blog

My #worldcon75 experience

Here’s the long overdue report from my day at the WorldCon 75, my first ever time attending. The event was held on August 9-13 in my home country, Finland, so it was a once in a life-time chance to experience it with a minimum trouble. I originally thought to attend the entire five days, but life intervened in the form of work, and so I could only attend on Saturday. I tried to make the most of it by planning a full day.

I arrived at the conference centre about fifteen minutes after the doors opened at nine in the morning, and the queue was already at least fifty metres long. It caused me a few palpitations until I figured it was the line for people who hadn’t purchased their day passes in advance. I had, so I just walked past, trying not to look gleeful. Half an hour later I felt bad for all those people when it was announced that the day was sold out, which left most of them outside. The queue for pre-purchased passes was three persons long, the shortest line for me the entire day. I…

Reading recap: August

August was my worst reading month so far and I only managed to finish two books. I have no excuses other than that I was busy working. I did start two more books, but I didn’t manage to finish them in August. And even though I read eight books in July, I’m now two books behind the schedule in my reading challenge of fifty-five books. I’ll have to step up. As has been my habit throughout the year, one book was from my reading list and the other wasn’t.
First book was Ride the Storm by Karen Chance, the long-awaited next chapter in her Cassandra Palmer urban fantasy series of time-travelling Pythia and her entourage of vampires, demons and mages. One vampire and one mage in particular. As always, it was a wild romp through space and time – at times a bit too wild. The first part of the book was constant tumbling from crisis to battle and back with no breathers or plot development in between, as if the author was afraid that the reader will get bored if something earth-shattering isn’t co…

Working with the editor: a case study

Editing has been on my mind lately, as I’ve been preparing Tracy Hayes, P.I. with the Eye for publishing. As a happy coincidence, Delilah S. Dawson had a lengthytweet chain about the topic too, prompted by her annoyance with aspiring authors unwilling to make changes that editors suggest to their books. Her response, in short, was that no author escapes the changes, so you’d better get used to them from the start. Her notes are useful to read in full.

She was speaking from the point of view of a traditionally published author who has more than one set of editors making suggestions and demands, all of which strive to make the book as good as possible. She doesn’t claim it’s easy to let other people to have their say, but that it’s necessary.
Listening to one’s editor is even more crucial for self-publishing authors, as we lack the gatekeepers of traditional publishing. If you’re lucky, you find one who understands your writing, and who isn’t afraid to tell you how you can improve it. If …