I’m partial to the subjective, ‘close’ third person point of
view in my novels: the reader sees what the character sees and feels, and not
much else. Since I write romances, I usually show the action through the eyes
of two main characters – the star-crossed lovers – although the style would
allow me to use a wider range of characters too. I especially like to show the
action through the eyes of the antagonist, a device I’m yet to use in my
Two-Natured London series where it would fit well.
As a reader, I’m not as particular. The third person
objective point of view, the omniscient narrative where the narrator knows more
than the characters, is interesting to read, even if it’s seldom used in modern
literature anymore, though particularly well done in Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrel by Susanna Clarke. And first person narrative can be fun or intense, depending
on the genre. There’s something very intimate about not knowing more than the
character does, which is probably why it works so well in detective stories.
But it can be very limiting too.
I find the first person narrative especially limiting in
romances, which necessarily tells the story of two people. As a reader, I’m often
dying to know what the other party thinks of the protagonist as the romance
unfolds. It feels like I’m missing half of the story, if I’m only shown the
romance from one point of view. I’m not alone in this, and sometimes the author
feels it’s necessary to give us the other side of the story too.
One popular way is to write short stories from a point of
view of a major or minor character, which are additions to the original. My
favourites are the – free – short stories Karen Chance offers to her readers
that range from the adventures of a minor character, like Kit Marlowe, to
important events in the life of a major character, like the stories about
Pritkin. They don’t all add to our understanding about the main
character Cassie, but they contribute to the world as a whole.
Some authors take it farther. A couple of extremely popular
books have recently been completely rewritten from the hero’s point of view –
the exact same story told twice. I haven’t read those popular retellings – I
haven’t read the originals even – but I doubt I’d enjoy them much. I wouldn’t be
learning anything new even though the point of view is different.
The temptation to tell an important scene twice in the same
book from different points of view is familiar to the writers of the close
third too – I luckily mostly grew over it before I published my first book.
It’s both redundant and annoying, and doesn’t, paradoxically, add anything to
the story. There are better ways to add value to your series with the changing
of the point of view.
I’ve recently read two books that are additions to popular
series and told from a perspective of a major character in the originals. Four
by Veronica Roth is an addition to her hugely popular Divergent series, and
Brighter than the Sun by Darynda Jones is an addition to Charley Davidson
series. They are not retellings of the
story we already know from a different point of view; they tell the story of
a different character so that the original story gets a new meaning.
Brighter than the Sun tells the life-story of Reyes, the
love of Charley’s life, from childhood on; a difficult story to read, as he had
a difficult childhood. Compared with the main series, which is at times
laugh-out-loud funny like the character telling it, the style is very
different. But that’s the way it needs to be, when the narrator, the main
character himself, is so different. It’s a short book and it ends rather
abruptly just as he finally meets Charley for the first time, but it achieves
its objective: deepening the readers’ understanding of a major character and
thus adding value to the entire series.
Four, as its name reveals, is about the character Four, who
along the narrator Tris is the main character in the Divergent series. The book
contains four fairly long short stories and a couple of short scenes written
from the Four’s first person point of view. The first three stories are set in the
time before Tris, and even after Tris appears in the fourth, the emphasis is on
other matters than Four’s relationship with her. He emerges as a fully formed,
interesting character with a story of his own, his hopes, dreams and fears –
all four of them. The end result is that I now very much want to read a whole new
series with him as the protagonist.
If you have chosen a first person narrative for your book or
series, and are now feeling its limitations, the way to change the
point of view is by creating new instead of warming up the old. Pick a
protagonist, be it the love interest or the villain, and write a story that
belongs to that character. You will add much more value to the series that way.
It doesn’t have to be a full length book. Your readers will love even a shorter
story – as long as it’s original. Try it. Even if you don’t publish it, it will deepen your understanding of your characters, and improve your writing. And that can only be good.
No comments:
Post a Comment